Mario Nawfal

BREAKING: DOJ SEEK GAG ORDER TO SILENCE TRUMP Special counsel Jack Smith's team wants to limit Trump's public statements, citing a risk to his 2020 election interference case. Accusing Trump of disinformation and intimidation tactics, they aim for a "narrowly tailored" order. Trump may challenge this as a First Amendment issue. The battle over free speech and legal boundaries looms as the case unfolds. Trump has denied all wrongdoing and denounced the election interference charges as "a persecution of a political opponent." Is this election interference or protecting the course of Justice?

BREAKING: Fauci Admits Vaccines Cause Myocarditis in Young Men But there’s a twist. Watch till the end. Why wasn’t this admitted earlier??

BREAKING: BIDEN WALKS AWAY WHEN ASKED ABOUT PARDONING HUNTER Will He Pardon Hunter?

Angry New Yorkers Turn on AOC | Migrant Crisis AOC and other democrats were heckled at a press conference regarding the migrant crisis in NY Protesters shouted “Close the Border” repeatedly, drowning out the speakers. This comes on the heels of NYC Mayor Adams admitting the migrant crisis could destroy the city. “I am your constituent!" a man was heard among the angry crowd. These constituents are tired of grandstanding politicians. They want solutions. Migrants play a key role in the city, but NYC can't handle the current volume. What solutions do you recommend?

This is why you don't let children choose their gender t.co/wBTlE7hkWq

DID THE ADL GET TUCKER CARLSON FIRED FROM FOX? In 2021, the ADL started calling on Fox to censor Tucker, quoting their infamous “freedom of speech is not freedom or reach” line. Later that year, they explicitly asked for him to be fired. In 2022, they called on tech companies to de-platform Tucker for ‘pushing conspiracy theories and white supremacist theories’, citing that Twitter and Fox News are his biggest platforms. In 2023, Tucker was surprisingly fired despite being the highest-rated show on Fox. Immediately, the ADL’s CEO, Jonathan Greenblatt responded with a tweet: “It’s about time. For far too long, Tucker Carlson has used his primetime show to spew antisemitic, racist, xenophobic & anti-LGBTQ hate to millions.” They FINALLY got what they wanted. Thankfully, within an hour of Tucker getting fired, @elonmusk contacted his producer, who had also been fired, and advised them to come to X. The rest is history. This could be yet another example of the ADL’s overreach. They potentially persuaded a television news network to destroy their highest-rated show because it didn't align with their values. Should the ADL have this level of power? Should more creators move to 𝕏?

Two days after the marathon space on the Russian mutiny, minutes after the BARRAGE of mainstream media hit pieces against me, I started filming a ‘Shark Tank’ TV show. I kept a straight face, turned my phone off, and trusted my team to deal with the attacks Enjoy the trailer!👇

🚨BREAKING: HUNTER BIDEN INDICTED ON GUN CHARGES Hunter Biden has been indicted on three counts tied to the possession of a gun while using narcotics. Prosecutors hinted at possible new charges. The case is being overseen by special counsel David Weiss, a Trump appointee. “First of all, my son has done nothing wrong. I trust him. I have faith in him.” - President Biden The indictment comes after a plea agreement on tax and gun charges fell apart in July, with the judge stating “the agreements are not straightforward, and they contain some atypical provisions.” The charges in today’s indictment: - Two counts stem from Biden allegedly claiming he wasn't using illegal drugs when purchasing a Colt Cobra revolver in October 2018. - The third count alleges possession of a firearm while using narcotics. For the first time ever this year, we have the son of a President and a former President both indicted. Whether you're a Democrat or a Republican, what we're seeing in U.S politics should be worrying for all.

BREAKING: Biden planning speech in 2 weeks on 'THREATS TO DEMOCRACY' What do you think those threats could be?

MEGYN KELLY PRESSES TRUMP ON VACCINES - Trump is ‘NOT PROUD’ of the vaccines and doesn’t want to talk about the speed of production, which many considered a success - He reminds Megyn that he didn’t mandate the vaccines - He acknowledged that while he didn't fire Fauci, but did override some of his decisions - He defended his decision to allow governors to determine their state's response re lockdowns - He reminded Megyn it was his decision to shut down travel from China, believing it saved hundreds of thousands of lives. - He believes he did a "tremendous job" and the efforts went underappreciated. Did Trump respond appropriately to COVID?

🚨"Reporter" harasses Elon for REFUSING TO ESCALATE the war and risking a NUCLEAR CONFLICT. Reporter: “Your ignorance and ego cost Ukrainian lives” Facts: Elon saved lives ON BOTH SIDES by avoiding a major escalation Reporter: “Officials say you enabled Putin as an aggressor” Facts: Officials are angry that @elonmusk did not accept to help them escalate the war with his private company. They literally wanted an American private company directly escalating a war! Reporter: “Putin calls you outstanding Mr Musk. What would you call Putin?” Facts: Is this really the best that the reporter can do? What a dumb question 😂 This is just sad...

This millionaire wants unemployment to hit 50% and 'pain in the economy', to remind employees they NEED employers. Have employees become ‘ungrateful’ and 'arrogant'? He even claims that Governments are INTENTIONALLY increasing unemployment, so employees become more grateful and less arrogant. To me, this is one of the dumbest takes I’ve ever heard in business. Disagree?

META COMPLETELY CENSORS COVID | BLOCKS SEARCHES | APP DIES Believe it or not, Meta is STILL blocking searches for “Covid” 🤯 This time, it’s on their dead Twitter Clone, and the world is noticing, even the media! So while @elonmusk fights the ADL and CCDH, Meta does the opposite! Julia Doubleday, of the World Health Network, emphasized that cutting off social media for individuals vulnerable to COVID was deemed "cruel" and "indefensible." The irony is that in an attempt to censor certain Covid information, Zuck and his team ended up blocking EVERYTHING, including basic Covid updates and helpful medical advice. A Pew Research Center survey from 2021 showed that 40% of Americans consider social media an essential source of COVID news. Surprisingly, the media is starting to wake up and notice how far things have gone. Guess who called out Meta? Taylor Lorenz from the Washington Post! And she’s not alone, here’s a few other examples of how the media is starting to realize their lies cannot continue: a) Meta's App Suppresses COVID Talk, Fueling Censorship Claims - Forbes b) Meta's App Censors COVID Discussion, Users Outraged - The Independent c) Meta's App Blocks COVID Searches, Critics Call It Censorship - TechCrunch Meta’s clone is dead anyway. The app has been losing daily active users at 1% per day. As of August daily active users are down 82%, from 44 million to just 8 million. To put that into perspective 𝕏’s monthly active users in November were at about 259.4 million users. RIP. Bonus: Enjoy the irony of the below video Is Censorship Dying?

BREAKING: ANOTHER PATHETIC ATTACK ON 𝕏 AND ELON - A NEW LOW FOR FREE SPEECH! Today, the CCDH published a report to paint 𝕏 as a ‘hate speech’ platform. Their research only considered 300 posts out of the HALF A BILLION daily posts (0.00006%!), and only from 100 accounts out of the 1.3 BILLION accounts on the platform (0.0000076%!!) And these 100 accounts were chosen intentionally as they conveniently posted divisive content. It gets worse… They then reported these posts over two days (August 30th and 31st) and reviewed them one week later (September 7) to see if they had been removed or acted upon. I reviewed the data. Some of these accounts only had 46 followers, and many are photos without text or text that is not hateful/relevant to the post. And 30% of these accounts even had their accounts locked or suspended! And to make things even worse for the CCDH, a handful of the posts were even removed! The CCDH also admitted they do not know “whether a post or account had been removed by X or the user controlling the account.” They did not bother to keep track of this! After one week, they came to this flagrant conclusion that 𝕏 is a hate speech platform. What kind of researchers come to a conclusion in just one week, with a TINY sample-size of 100 accounts and 300 posts?? THE FACTS: A few months ago, the 𝕏 Safety team shared that an independent assessment by Sprinklr found that hate speech impressions on 𝕏 “to be 0.003% compared to Twitter’s estimate of 0.012%.” Sprinklr did their analysis the RIGHT WAY: They used more than 550,000 tweets for this research and had their AI engine analyze it. This is how to run a proper analysis! - They also found that tweets that contained toxic/slur words received three times FEWER impressions. - 86% of the 550,000 tweets were non-toxic. - Of the other 14% of posts that got labeled as toxic, some of them were primarily using the terms in non-toxic contexts like reclaimed speech or casual greetings. The AI had auto-detected those words. These hit-piece reports are getting embarrassing. They’re not even trying to do things right to hide their agenda! The facts don’t lie: The attacks on 𝕏 and @elonmusk are getting more ridiculous by the day. Elon is suing them, and based on today's report, his case seems much stronger than I initially thought.

🚨BREAKING: NEW ATTACK AGAINST ELON AND 𝕏 IN THE NEXT 24 HOURS This organization unlawfully accessed 𝕏 data, lied, Elon sued them, and now they are preparing their second attack! The CCDH is following ADL’s playbook: - Make false claims about hate speech on 𝕏 - Scare advertisers - Have the media perpetuate the lies - Rinse and repeat Elon did not bend the knee. Instead, he sued them for making “inflammatory, outrageous, and false or misleading assertions about Twitter” with the aim “to drive advertisers off Twitter by smearing the company and its owner.” Well, tomorrow, a new attack is incoming, days after @elonmusk threatened to sue the ADL. The 𝕏 Saftey Team shared that tomorrow, the CCDH will be publishing a report that accuses 𝕏 of two false claims: 1. That 𝕏 did not take action on violative posts This is NOT True. 𝕏 has an extensive Terms of Service that removes or suppresses the reach of posts that violate these rules. An excerpt from the 𝕏 Terms of Service: “We reserve the right to remove Content that violates the User Agreement, including, for example, copyright or trademark violations or other intellectual property misappropriation, impersonation, unlawful conduct, or harassment.” A very notable example was when Kayne West posted a Swastika. The post was removed, and he was suspended from the platform. Another is when Nick Fuentes posted a chart highlighting Jewish executives at prominent companies titled “Who Controls Your Mind? 2023.” The chart played into antisemitic tropes claiming Jewish people control the world. The post was removed, and he was suspended. 2. Violent posts on 𝕏 reached many people on the platform. This is NOT TRUE. The 𝕏 Safety team shared that an independent assessment by Sprinklr found that hate speech impressions on 𝕏 “to be 0.003% compared to Twitter’s estimate of 0.012%.” Also, 𝕏’s CEO shared: “Recently, we’ve expanded our Freedom of Speech Not Reach policy enforcement because we’re seeing exceptional results. For example, in comparison to a healthy Tweet, any Tweet that's labeled with this enforcement is restricted from scaling and experiences a dramatic drop in reach of more than 80%. Additionally, we proactively prevent all ads from appearing adjacent to any content that's labeled." So, despite all this, the CCDH is preparing their second attack, an attack on our 1st amendment right. Goal? KILL FREEDOM OF SPEECH

ELON’S BIOGRAPHY REVEALS HE WAS RIGHT ABOUT COVID FROM THE BEGINNING In Walter Isaacson’s biography, Musk criticized lockdowns and government mandates from the beginning. On March 6, 2020, amidst the Covid panic, Musk tweeted, “The coronavirus panic is dumb”. Here’s a few revelations from the biography: - When California issued a stay-at-home order, Elon defied it, insisting that the Fremont factory would remain open. - He expressed concern for employees' health but believed that the pandemic's economic damage outweighed the virus's threat. - Elon: “If somebody wants to stay in their house, that's great, but to say that they cannot leave their house, and they will be arrested if they do, this is fascist. This is not democratic. This is not freedom.” - @elonmusk filed a lawsuit against lockdown orders which threatened to close his factory. He kept the plant running, challenging authorities to arrest him if necessary. Subsequent events have vindicated Elon and demonstrated that he was on the right side of history. Why did most people at the time disagree? Well, just today, I posted about a campaign to deceive the public using false 'science', where the C.I.A allegedly bribed Covid investigators on the source of the virus. Remember how social media considered the Lab Leak Theory a ‘conspiracy’ and censored it?

ADL BEHIND TRUMP SOCIAL MEDIA BAN Today at the All-In Summit, Elon Musk shared with the panel that the ADL was instrumental in de-platforming Donald Trump, and when his account was restored on 𝕏, they said that “constituted as hate speech.” The hilarious part that Elon noted is that Trump “didn't even say anything. He has to say something at least say something or post something, for there to be incremental hateful conduct.” Calling this absurd. @elonmusk believes this has to do with the ‘woke agenda,’ and most of what these organizations do is contrary to what donors believe. The ADL's overreach is becoming more evident by the day. NO organization should be able to censor the President of the country, left or right! IS THE ADL TOO POWERFUL?

ELON’S BIOGRAPHER MAKES A MISTAKE: THE MEDIA POUNCES There has been significant media attention following our report that Elon deactivated Starlink to prevent a potential Ukrainian ambush of the Russian fleet in Crimea, which could have escalated into a nuclear conflict. After the reports, Elon commented on on my post, explaining that Starlink was not active in that region, and he CHOSE NOT TO activate it: “The Starlink regions in question were not activated. SpaceX did not deactivate anything.” Walter Isaacson, the biography’s author, later made the correction on 𝕏: “To clarify on the Starlink issue: the Ukrainians THOUGHT coverage was enabled all the way to Crimea, but it was not. They asked Musk to enable it for their drone sub attack on the Russian fleet. Musk did not enable it, because he thought, probably correctly, that would cause a major war.” In an interview with the Washington Post, Walter confirmed the mistake was made due to a ‘misunderstanding’, and that it will be corrected in subsequent editions. Now watch mainstream media use this mistake to attack @elonmusk.

BREAKING: BIDEN TO BE IMPEACHED? U.S. House Kevin McCarthy announces a formal impeachment inquiry into Joe Biden. Encourages Biden and his team to cooperate to get the answers. Should Biden be impeached?