Mario Nawfal

Biggest Anti-Vax Athlete In The World Wins Moderna-Sponsored US Open Title Novak Djokovic, who got kicked out of the U.S Open last year for not being vaccinated, won the US Open Title today as well as the ‘Shot of the Day’, which are sponsored by Moderna😂 The irony is too real

BREAKING: HAWAII'S KILAUEA VOLCANO ERPUTS! Alert Level Elevated To Warning The Kilauea Volcano in Hawaii, one of the world's most active volcanoes, has started erupting, unleashing lava fountains inside its crater. The USGS has given a red alert for Kilauea due to the emission of hazardous volcanic gases and ongoing lava activities. Authorities indicate that a series of recent earthquakes prompted this eruption. Currently, there's no danger to the public. Standby for more updates!

THEY WILL ASSASSINATE TRUMP! Tucker Carlson said: “We're speeding towards assassination, obviously!" He listed EVERYTHING they have done to try to stop Trump: 1) Protested him 2) Called him names 3) Impeached him TWICE 4) Fabricated lies about Jan 6 against Trump 5) Indicted him FOUR times! And STILL, Trump's popularity has increased! Both sides have decided that he is SO THREATENING that they can't have him. I don't think he'll be assassinated, at least not by his opponents, however I agree that everything they've done so far seems to just make him more popular. Do you think 'they' will assassinate Trump?

CNN ATTACKS ELON | BLINKEN'S REPLY WILL SHOCK YOU CNN has asked for ‘repercussions’ against Elon, saying he ‘sabotaged a military operation by Ukraine.’ I’m not making this up... Elon refuses to directly participate in a war, and CNN calls it ‘sabotage' 😂 It gets worse… US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken responds to CNN’s Jake Tapper by ignoring his allegations and pointing out the BENEFITS Starlink brought the Ukrainian people! Tapper dismisses Blinken’s reply, since it doesn’t criticize Elon, and moves to a new stupid agenda: Elon’s ‘secret talks’ with the Senior Russian Officials, claiming Elon is doing his own “diplomatic outreach to the Russian Government.” Blinken AGAIN ignores the stupid question and AGAIN highlights how important and impactful Starlink has been to Ukraine. And guess how Tapper wraps up the interview? “It sounds like Starlink's so important the US government doesn't want to risk offending a capricious billionaire.” WHAT?! Biden’s administration has a history of attacking Elon: There are already multiple bogus investigations against his companies ongoing right now. Remember last week’s secret ‘glass house’ that the DOJ and SEC are apparently investigating? 😂 How about X getting fined for refusing to hand over Trump’s personal Twitter data and information to prosecutors? Or SpaceX getting sued by the DOJ for hiring Americans in the company’s hiring process? (not making this up!) CNN, feel free to hate @elonmusk, but try to be more subtle about it...

NYC MIGRANT CRISIS | EXPOSING MAYOR'S 180 DEGREE TURN Mayor Eric Adams WELCOMED migrants for months, but now decries a migrant crisis that 'will destroy the city." What happed? Why the change? In Spring 2022, Adams proudly declared NYC as a 'shelter state.' However, his tune has changed since buses carrying around 110,000 asylum seekers arrived. Now Adams has asked a judge to suspend the Right to Shelter policy and has initiated a plan to distribute flyers at the US-Mexico border telling newly arrived migrants to 'consider another city.' We must remember that the economy needs immigrants: 1. In 2016, immigrants added $2 trillion to the U.S. GDP. 2. In 2018, they contributed $458.7 billion to state, local, and federal taxes. 3. Immigrants also have $1.3 trillion in spending power and can help fill labor demand and maintain the social safety net as more Americans retire. 4. Between 2010 and 2019, foreign-born workers accounted for up to one-quarter of employment growth and up to three-quarters of the growth in business establishments. 5. Skilled immigrants generated 30% to 50% of total U.S. productivity growth between 1990 and 2010 6. Immigrants pay more than $90 billion in taxes yearly and receive only $5 billion in welfare. Should other cities step up and help by accepting some of these immigrants? Is blaming immigration becoming a scapegoat for political failures? Or should we simply close the borders?

NFL SUNDAY GAMES SPACE - PREVIEW & ANALYSIS (LIVE in 2 hours) The NFL season is in full swing, and we're bringing it LIVE TO TWITTER! Journalists and passionate fans are gathering live to dissect every game, share their thoughts, and ignite the discussions. At 6pm EST, we're kicking off a Twitter Space that will have you primed and ready for tomorrow's NFL showdowns and betting lines. We're not just fans; we're your NFL game day guides! And here's a special shout-out to our sponsor, @TeamBookiebot! They've made betting on your favorite teams this weekend a breeze. Try it out, and make your game day even more thrilling. Join us in the conversation, and let's make this NFL season unforgettable together. LINK IN THE COMMENTS!

MEDIA ATTACKS ELON FOR PREVENTING POSSIBLE NUCLEAR WAR First, the media attacked Elon over ADL, and now it’s his REFUSAL to escalate the Ukraine war. 1. Elon Musk ‘committed evil’ with Starlink order, says Ukrainian official - The Guardian Please explain how preventing the escalation of a war with the country with the most nuclear warheads is ‘evil’! Read the quotes below and tell me: Do you think it is better for the world and humanity if a U.S. private company facilitated a major attack on Russia’s fleet in Crimea? Blinken: Crimea a ‘red line’ for Putin Putin: Russia would use nuclear weapons if it felt its "vital interests" were threatened Medvedev: “If it comes to nuclear weapons, there will have to be a preemptive strike." Putin: Russia's nuclear weapons were "not just a deterrent, but also a means of ensuring Russia's security." So the Government literally asked Elon to cross a ‘RED LINE’ with the President of a country that has threatened on many occasions to use Nuclear weapons. I fail to understand how the media can twist this into a bad thing! 2. Ukraine is furious with Elon Musk for thwarting an attack on Russia's navy - NBC No NBC, you do not speak for MILLIONS of Ukrainians using Starlink to communicate for FREE, costing Starlink $80 million while the country’s internet infrastructure was in utter ruin. 3. Ukraine rips Elon Musk for disrupting sneak attack on Russian fleet with Starlink cutoff - CNBC Ukraine rips Elon? The country uses Starlink for free! And Starling’s terms of service are clear: “Our terms of service clearly prohibit Starlink for offensive military action, as we are a civilian system, so they were again asking for something that was expressly prohibited.” - Elon. 4. Elon Musk sabotaged Ukrainian attack on Russian fleet in Crimea by turning off Starlink, new book says - Politico @elonmusk said it himself: The "Starlink regions in question were not activated. SpaceX did not deactivate anything." and "At no point did I or anyone at SpaceX promise coverage over Crimea." The book's author confirmed this: “The Ukrainians THOUGHT coverage was enabled all the way to Crimea, but it was not. They asked Musk to enable it for their drone sub attack on the Russian fleet. Musk did not enable it, because he thought, probably correctly, that would cause a major war.” 5. U.S. Gov can't allow Musk the power to intervene in wars - The Daily Beast So the guy you asked to intervene and refused should not be allowed to intervene? The irony😂 MY THOUGHTS: The fact that the US Government openly called Crimea a ‘Red Line’ for Putin, yet a U.S. private company was requested to participate in crossing that line, is MIND BOGGLING. Governments should be the ones trying to save lives and de-escalate wars, not keep them going! Instead, we have a private company de-escalating while the Government is trying to do the opposite. And on top of this, the media attacks the de-escalating party and supports the ones escalating. Does anyone want this war to end??? And does mainstream media even care about the truth anymore?

On my quest to live forever. Do you want to join? t.co/NdeNbjDtvt

ADL-BACKED MEDIA ATTACKS ELON MUSK As usual, the media is on the attack against Elon. Let’s debunk some of these headlines: 1. Elon Musk claims to be ‘against antisemitism of any kind,’ but has done precious little to prove it - Fortune Precious little? Since Elon took over, an independent research firm found that “more than 99% of content users and advertisers see on Twitter is healthy,” and they estimated social media hate speech impressions “to be 0.003% compared to Twitter’s estimate of 0.012%.” 2. Elon Musk Blames ADL for Destroying Website He Ruined Himself - Rolling Stone They say Elon destroyed 𝕏, yet all the metrics show the platform is breaking records (Monthly Users, User Minutes Per Day, Video Views) 3. Civil rights groups attacked by Elon Musk are mounting a counter-offensive - NBC 'Civil rights groups' 😂 4. Elon Musk’s Latest Target Hits Back - The Atlantic Ironic how they call Elon the target, when the ADL ADMITTED to pressuring advertisers FOR MONTHS to leave 𝕏, dropping advertising revenue by 60%. @elonmusk finally hits back, yet somehow the ADL became the target and they are hitting back? 😂 I don’t know what’s stronger, mainstream media’s HATE FOR ELON, or their LOVE FOR THE ADL?

🚨 BREAKING: ELON SUES CALIFORNIA FOR CENSORSHIP 𝕏 has taken legal action against California, challenging a law that mandates social media platforms to disclose their content removal policies, especially concerning hate speech, misinformation, and harassment. This unique legislation, endorsed by California Gov. Gavin Newsom last year, is now under scrutiny by X Corp. for potentially infringing on First Amendment rights. While Assembly Bill 587 demands platforms to be transparent about their moderation policies and submit biannual reports, 𝕏 Corp. argues in its lawsuit that the law forces companies into unwanted speech and pressures them to limit or demonetize content that is constitutionally protected. The case has been filed in the Eastern District Court of California. Do you support 𝕏 and @Elonmusk in this fight?

🚨 BREAKING: NEW CALIFORNIA LAW CAN TAKE YOUR TRANSGENDER KIDS The California State Assembly just passed a bill proposing a new law requiring judges to consider a parent's affirmation of their child's identity in custody cases. WHAT DOES THIS MEAN? If a parent refuses to accept their child's gender transition, they could LOSE CUSTODY of that child! The child would go to the parent that agrees with the gender transition. Governor Gavin Newsom has until Oct. 14 to sign or veto the bill.

🚨 BREAKING: California has become the first State to recognize 'Transgender History Month' “Let’s lift up the history of the transgender Californians who left their mark on our great state.” - The bill’s author, Matt Haney Will other States follow suit? What's next?

ADL BANNING TRUMP FROM TWITTER: Election Interference? After months of pressure from the ADL, the President of the most powerful nation in the world was banned from Twitter. Yes, the same ADL that CEO Jonathan Greenblatt wants us to think is a ‘small non for profit in NY’. WHAT HAPPENED? During the 2016 presidential campaign, the ADL frequently criticized Trump for allegedly using antisemitic narratives and promoting divisive rhetoric. Even after his election, the ADL continued to challenge Trump for seemingly endorsing extremists like white supremacists, exploiting antisemitism for political gain, and perpetuating antisemitic stereotypes. They even called for his removal from office after January 6. He was banned within days. The ADL and the Stop Hate for Profit coalition, co-founded by the ADL, urged ALL social media platforms to #'BanTrumpSaveDemocracy' and permanently remove him from their platforms by January 20. They also pushed for brands and companies to withdraw advertising on these social media networks until Trump is PERMANENTLY banned from these platforms. Remember how Greenblatt claimed 2 days ago that the ADL was ‘not out there publicly or privately talking to advertisers’? This illustrates the power and influence of the ADL. MY THOUGHTS: I’m trying to give the ADL the benefit of the doubt, as I greatly respect their mission statement and what they stand for. However, the amount of power and influence they possess under Greenblatt, and the way they use it, should not be acceptable in any democracy. They can and did silence the President of the most powerful country in the world. They can and did financially cripple Facebook and 𝕏, two of the largest social media platforms. Do not be deceived when they refer to themselves as "a small non-profit out of New York." They are a behemoth, using their mission statement to stifle free speech. I don’t advocate banning the ADL, however change is needed. If that does not happen, then the ADL will naturally cease to exist as more people realize what’s truly happening behind the scenes. Should all social media platforms join @elonmusk against the ADL?

🚨 BREAKING: ELON DEBUNKS CNN | PREVENTS POTENTIAL NUCLEAR CONFLICT Elon just confirmed the U.S or Ukrainian Government requested him to play a significant role in a MAJOR ESCALATION in the Ukraine war. CNN reported that Elon deactivated his Starlink satellites in response to a covert attack the Ukrainians were planning on the Russian naval fleet. They were WRONG! Elon clarified the satellites were NOT active, and that he was pressured by the Government to activate them so that Ukraine can attack Russian ships in a contentious territory. “There was an emergency request from government authorities to activate Starlink all the way to Sevastopol. The obvious intent being to sink most of the Russian fleet at anchor.” @elonmusk refused to activate Starlink, avoiding “a major act of war and conflict escalation.” So not only are Governments not deescalating the war, but they have also actively tried to drag a private company to play a role in ESCALATING. This is NOT how peace will be reached!

ELON PREVENTS NUCLEAR WAR? Elon Musk covertly instructed his engineers to deactivate Starlink's satellite communications network during a MAJOR Ukrainian offensive. This action was taken to intentionally thwart a surprise attack by Ukraine against the Russian naval fleet. The Ukrainian submarine drones, armed with explosives, mysteriously lost connectivity as they advanced towards the Russian warships. Now we know that Musk intentionally deactivated Starlink. Ukrainian officials pleaded for the reactivation of the satellites, however Musk was concerned the attack could trigger a nuclear response from Russia. This fear was not baseless, as Musk had open discussions with high-ranking Russian officials not long before the attack. I’ve posted heavily about the dangerous rhetoric from Russia relating to a possible Nuclear attack on Ukraine, with Crimea being considered a Red Line. No matter which side of the war you’re on, we all want to avoid a nuclear conflict, and @elonmusk’s actions may have prevented just that. Do you think Elon did the right thing?

EXPOSED: ADL’S HISTORY OF GETTING SUED & NEVER ADMITTING WRONGDOING Elon will likely file a lawsuit against the ADL “to clear our platform’s name on the matter of anti-Semitism.” The ADL isn't a stranger to the courtroom, and their track record is concerning: 1. ADL v. Civil Rights Groups In 1993, the ADL was sued by civil rights groups representing Arab Americans and African Americans for allegedly hiring agents to gather secret information on them. They reached a settlement to pay $175,000 toward the plaintiffs’ legal fees and to establish a $25,000 community relations fund for programs to facilitate improved relations between and among Arab American, Jewish, African American, and other minority communities in the US. RESULT: The ADL did not admit wrongdoing but agreed to a restraining injunction barring ADL from obtaining information from state employees, which is forbidden by law to disclose. 2. William Quigley and Anne Quigley v. Rosenthal This was their last true loss. In 2000 when a judge in Colorado fined the ADL $10.5 million in a defamation suit. William and Anne Quigley were accused of anti-Semitic behavior by their neighbors, Mitchell and Candice Aronson. The Aronsons recorded the Quigleys' conversations without their consent and gave the recordings to the ADL, which then publicly accused the Quigleys of hate crimes. In response, the Quigleys sued the ADL and its regional director, Saul Rosenthal, for defamation. In 2000, a Denver jury ruled in favor of the Quigleys, finding that the ADL had defamed them. The ADL appealed the verdict, but the appeals court upheld the ruling. RESULT: The ADL eventually paid the $10.5 million fine plus interest in 2004 but never admitted any wrongdoing. This was a major setback for the ADL. MY THOUGHTS: As you can see in both examples above, the ADL DID NOT ADMIT WRONGDOING, despite paying hefty sums of money and having to face penalties such as a restraining injunction. How can the ADL never admit guilt? Also, should other social media platforms join @ElonMusk’s lawsuit? Remember that Zuckerberg was HEAVILY pressured by the ADL in 2021, also losing substantial amounts of money before caving!

BREAKING: CHINESE USE FAKE A.I ACCOUNTS FOR ELECTION INTERFERENCE Here's what we know from Microsoft researchers: 1. Chinese hackers used generative A.I technology to "mimic U.S. voters.” 2. Fake accounts posed as Americans, used U.S. locations and political slogans 3. One example depicts the Statue of Liberty holding an assault rifle with the caption: "Everything is being thrown away. THE GODDESS OF VIOLENCE." 4. Attack resembles China's Ministry of Public Security, but the Chinese embassy refuted the claims. 5. Facebook and 𝕏/Twitter were among the platforms impacted 6. The discovery raises concerns about foreign interference ahead of the 2024 U.S. presidential election. This news comes hours after Microsoft admitted Chinese hackers hacked their engineer’s data, and used that to access a U.S official’s emails. A few weeks ago, I also reported on Chinese cyber attacks on U.S infrastructure, as well as a web of fake accounts by the Chinese to spread misinformation, uncovered by Meta. Is China attacking the 2024 elections?

The amount of innovation at 𝕏 since @elonmusk took over and cut costs is difficult to fathom. The 𝕏 team keeps on building despite the challenges, the noise and the necessary cost cutting. 🫡

BREAKING: NEW LAWSUIT TO PREVENT TRUMP FROM RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT A lawsuit has been filed to remove Trump from the Colorado primary ballot, preventing him from running for Presidency. Section 3 of the 14th Amendment disqualifies individuals from future public office if they've engaged in insurrection or aided enemies while in a prior office. The case, cited by the Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, alleges Trump “engaged in insurrection” or provided “aid or comfort to the enemies”. If this passes through, Congress will need to vote with two third majority to allow Trump to continue running for President. Will Trump be barred from running for President?

BARACK OBAMA'S BOYFRIEND: OBAMA IS GAY? Larry Sinclair, a man interviewed by Tucker Carlson, claimed in 2008 that Obama took drugs and had an affair with a choir director who was later murdered. In his interview with Tucker Carlson, Sinclair claims he had sexual relations with Obama. It's important to note that Sinclair also had a lengthy criminal history, including convictions on forgery, fraud, and larceny charges, and has served prison time. In Tucker's clip, Sinclair said: “I had given Barack $250 to pay for cocaine, next thing I know, he's [Obama] got a little pipe, and he's smoking it. So I just started rubbing my hand along his thighs to see where it was going, and it went the direction I had intended it to go. It definitely wasn't Barack's first time.” He is insinuating that Obama has had relations with him and with other men. I don't believe those claims, and I don't really care either. Why does this all matter? Who cares if Obama, or ANY politician, is straight, gay, or bi? Obama was the President. We should be debating his policies and his legacy. If OBAMA was straight, would we have pulled out of Afghanistan earlier? If TRUMP didn’t sleep with hookers, would Covid vaccines be better? If BIDEN'S son wasn’t a crackhead, would the war in Ukraine have ended? If BILL CLINTON didn’t have sexual intercourse in the White House, would there not have been a war in Kosovo? Would you care if your President was Gay?

🚨 BREAKING: HUNTER BIDEN TO BE INDICTED ON GUN-RELATED CHARGES The DOJ announced that Special Counsel David Weiss is set to pursue an indictment against Hunter Biden on gun-related charges. Hunter Biden had initially entered into a deal involving a gun possession charge, which, if adhered to, would have shielded him from prosecution over a 24-month period. However, the plea deal unraveled in court, and the fate of this arrangement has remained uncertain. According to the Speedy Trial Act, the Government must secure a grand jury indictment by September 29th at the earliest. The special counsel's office is pushing to meet this deadline, aiming to bring formal charges against Hunter Biden. In response, Biden's legal team is expected to submit their own filing by the end of the day, setting the stage for what could be a significant legal battle ahead. How do you think this will this play out for the Biden family?

BREAKING: DEBUNKING THE LIES IN ADL'S RESPONSE TO ELON ADL's CEO broke his silence on 𝕏 and Elon by lying and trapping the host: 1) He claimed that Elon brought and amplified anti-semitism and hate speech back to the platform. This is NOT TRUE. The 𝕏 Safety team shared that an independent assessment by Sprinklr found that hate speech impressions on 𝕏 “to be 0.003% compared to Twitter’s estimate of 0.012%.” 2) Greenblatt clarified that he has never claimed Elon or 𝕏 are anti-Semitic: “I don’t think Twitter as a platform is anti-Semitic.” 3) When Greenblatt was asked by the host (who also identified as Jewish) if he was seeking a position or donation from 𝕏 to the ADL, he took offense to this, called it an anti-semetic trope, almost as if he was trying to cancel him, leaving the host uncomfortable and defensive. 4) Greenblatt claimed ADL is NOT publicly or privately talking to advertisers, BUT shortly after, said, “It is true we did call for a pause back in November, after the acquisition and since then” and in a previous interview he stated “if it remains a hellscape the advertisers won't take part in [Twitter]” 5) Greenblatt said the ADL is a SMALL non-profit in NY. NOT TRUE. The ADL is an influential organization with over 100 years of history, and according to the ADL's 2021 tax filings, the organization's total revenue was $101 million with a balance sheet of $238 million. They ALSO received millions of dollars of indirect government funding via grants to groups in which the ADL has special interests. 6) Greenblatt says the ADL works WITH other social media platforms, including Facebook. We saw in the Politico article that @elonmusk posted that the ADL indirectly CONTROLS what can be posted on Facebook. 7) Greenblatt claimed he doesn't know what prompted Elon's tweets, but Elon was clear it was prompted by the 60% drop in advertising from the ADL’s interference, which Greenblatt admitted in the video. Doesn’t seem like the meeting with X CEO Linda Yaccarino went as well as Greenblatt is making it out to be.